I appreciate the response, but I don’t appreciate the baseless accusation of revisionism.

My argument is simply, “[T]he Second Amendment has never once in American history been legally applied to support the poor, or to support anyone who has challenged the rich and powerful in this country.”

Your response does not in any way debunk that argument. Your points simply detail the history that is presented in my article.

It seems to me that your response is more caught up in anachronistic partisanship than actually addressing the history.

I’m glad the headline caught your eye, in any case. This is an important conversation.